Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Code Enforcement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Neighbor dispute over septic system prompts public comment and executive‑session discussion
Summary
A homeowner asked the commission to review repeated complaints and asserted state sign‑offs; commissioners discussed code enforcement history, percolation/perk issues, potential perk tests and the need for more investigation; executive sessions were used to discuss personnel and privacy issues related to enforcement.
Get email alerts on the Code Enforcement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Several residents addressed the commission about a long‑running dispute over a septic system and runoff in a Mapleton subdivision. Kevin Allen (identified on his card) described a house built in 1984 and told the board that the line on his property had been capped by a licensed plumber and that the Kansas Department of Health (KDH) had inspected and signed off on work. He said there are natural springs and multiple uphill properties contributing to runoff. Neighbors and commissioners exchanged technical points about percolation ("perk") tests, the difficulty of enforcing retroactive remediation, and that some systems are grandfathered under older codes.
Commissioners acknowledged prior inspections by the state and county; they said further investigation would be needed if evidence showed systems were not percolating as required. The board noted executive‑session deliberations had been held earlier under KSA 75‑4319(b)(1) to discuss personnel elements of the matter and returned to open session with no action. Commissioners directed staff to review historical permitting and septic install drawings for properties in the immediate area and to report back, and they recommended that any individual disputes that implicate county employees continue to be handled in executive session to protect privacy.
No formal enforcement action or changes to codes were adopted at the meeting; commissioners asked staff to gather records and provide background material for further public discussion or formal action.

