Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Utility Billing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee advances study of residential electric bill design after mixed views on cost and transparency
Summary
The Energy and Technology Committee voted to move Senate Bill 243 (LCO 3335) — a study of residential electric customer bill design — to the floor after members debated the value of further redesign, who would pay for it, and whether recent changes already improved transparency.
State Representative Jonathan Steinberg, co-chair of the Energy and Technology Committee, said the panel would consider 15 bills and moved into the first item, Senate Bill 243, a legislative study of how residential electric bills are designed (LCO 3335). Senator Needleman moved the bill and the committee debated whether another redesign — after a recent overhaul — would help or simply add cost that is passed to ratepayers.
Senator Fazio said the earlier redesign had improved transparency but that he remained skeptical of another near-term change, adding, “the electric bills are too damn high.” Representative Mara said the Office of Consumer Counsel’s forthcoming breakout of public-benefit charges would inform further work and that she would vote yes with reservations. Representative Buckby and others pressed whether redesign costs would be borne by electric distribution companies and thus passed through to customers.
Supporters described the proposal as an opportunity to refine transparency and to make online tools and bill breakdowns more accessible to the public; skeptics warned that implementation costs typically are recovered in rates. After discussion the committee approved the measure as JFS (Joint Favorable Substitute) to the floor. The clerk opened a roll-call vote and the chamber held votes open until 5:00 p.m. for remote members to cast votes.
The committee’s next meeting was announced for Thursday at 1:00, when members said they expected to continue negotiation on many of the bills advanced from this session. The committee did not set an effective date within this session; further study work will be the next step if the bill advances on the floor.
