Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Special Education topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Teachers and parents press Antioch Unified on special-education supports and classroom budgets
Summary
Several district educators told the board that classroom budgets and special-education responses are inequitable or too slow; one teacher said general-education classrooms received $350 while special-education received $150 and another cited federal special-education identification duties.
Multiple teachers and parents used the public-comment period at the Aug. 13 board meeting to press the district for clearer special-education procedures and to protest recent classroom-budget changes.
Melissa Holmes Vivong, an education specialist at Turner Elementary, said she learned general-education teachers would receive $350 for classroom supplies while special-education teachers would receive $150, then said the district removed individual classroom budgets and consolidated supplies into a single closet that "doesn't meet the needs of our diverse learners." She urged the board to revisit the policy "to ensure equity for our very deserving students."
Amanda Freighus, a kindergarten teacher at Fremont Elementary, told the board she had parents submit documentation before the first day for students she believed needed special-education services. She said she was told the concerns were not severe, and that it took several days to secure placements for students who clearly needed support on the first day. Freighus referenced the federal duty to locate and evaluate students (cited in the hearing as §300.11) and said the identification and response process can take months, harming children who need timely services.
Freighus also raised operational concerns about printing and materials: she described a print-shop turnaround so slow that a teacher could not receive classroom materials in time for a six-week instructional cycle and said that limited copying access increases teacher workload and hampers instruction.
Trustee comments following public comment acknowledged the concerns and asked staff to follow up: board members asked for reports back on special-education processes and indicated a future agenda for deeper discussion on family safety and district resources.
The board did not take immediate policy action at the meeting; trustees directed staff to compile resources and previously used materials and to consider bringing a presentation or study session to address the issues raised.
