Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the District Finance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Wauwatosa committee hears Moody’s downgrade, $3.5 million chargeback and borrowing plans
Summary
Public commenters and staff told the Finance & Resource Committee on March 13 that a recent Moody’s downgrade and a $3.5 million property-tax chargeback have tightened the district’s finances; staff previewed two borrowing resolutions the board will consider to address cash flow and to sell $45 million in referendum bonds.
Dr. Marker, a Wauwatosa resident and candidate for school board, opened public comment at the Finance & Resource Committee meeting by citing Moody’s recent downgrade of the district’s issuer and general obligation ratings and warning that the district’s available fund balance had narrowed.
“What is the plan? What is the plan to rebuild reserves? What is the plan to protect the district’s credit? What is the plan to avoid another downgrade?” Dr. Marker asked the committee, citing Moody’s finding that available fund balance is roughly 12% of operating revenue and noting the district’s ongoing capital program.
Later in the public-comment period, resident Dan Stemper asked why the district’s $3.5 million share of a roughly $10 million settlement tied to a large taxpayer dispute appeared to have been communicated to taxing jurisdictions months after the settlement and why it was not included in last year’s budget. “Why did it take 3 months from July 2025 to September to communicate the settlement and chargeback to the taxing jurisdictions?” Stemper asked.
Staff explained that timing for a property-tax chargeback is set by state processes: the Department of Revenue notifies taxing authorities of exact amounts after settlements are processed, and the Department of Public Instruction’s revenue cap and levy-certification schedule limit when districts can levy for those dollars. Jay Scott, the committee presenter, said the district was notified of the chargeback timeline in November and that the district paid its portion in mid-February to meet the Department of Revenue’s deadline.
To address possible near-term cash shortfalls, staff previewed two resolutions that will appear on the full board agenda. The first would provide short-term cash-flow borrowing authority tied to the $3.5 million chargeback so the district can avoid a payroll shortfall if cash is tight this summer; staff described arrangements with municipal partners and banks as options for that credit. The second resolution would authorize sale of the remaining $45 million in referendum bonds; the district’s financial advisor, Robert W. Baird, was quoted as recommending the timing to lock in a yield before rates move higher.
Committee members linked fund-balance levels to credit ratings and long-term borrowing costs, and staff said Moody’s review and a public call with the business office and Baird informed the district’s recent downgrade. Staff emphasized the board will have a formal vote on both borrowing items at upcoming meetings.
The committee did not vote on either resolution; both were presented as items that will be on the board agenda for formal action.
