Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Judicial Elections topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate rejects amendment to make probate judges nonpartisan after partisan debate
Summary
After extensive floor debate about judicial independence and electoral turnout, the Georgia Senate failed to approve House Resolution 251, a constitutional amendment that would have made probate judges elected in nonpartisan contests (Y 31, N 18), falling short of the two-thirds threshold required for passage.
The Georgia Senate declined Thursday to send a constitutional amendment to voters that would have made probate judges elected in nonpartisan contests, after a lengthy debate on whether removing party labels would restore confidence in the courts or depress voter participation.
House Resolution 251, sponsored in the House and reported favorably by the Senate Judiciary Committee, would have changed the ballot language so probate judicial races no longer listed party affiliation. Supporters on the floor argued the measure would reduce the appearance of partisan influence in routine judicial functions. "This helps encourage overall more confidence in our judicial system," Senator Strickland (42nd District) said during debate, urging colleagues to approve the amendment so voters could decide in a future referendum.
Opponents countered that removing party labels often reduces turnout in the low-profile races that decide probate judgeships and that the majority did not negotiate the measure with the minority caucus before placing it on the floor. "If your probate judges are not able to exercise the law without partisan leanings, that's a problem with the judge — vote them out," said a senator opposing the measure, arguing the change would shift power away from voters.
Senators also framed the dispute as a broader institutional dispute over floor practice: several minority senators said leadership did not seek their votes or engage in customary pre-vote negotiation on a matter that requires a two-thirds majority. That procedural complaint was a frequent theme in the hours-long debate.
When the roll call concluded the amendment received 31 yeas and 18 nays — short of the two-thirds (66.7%) required to place a constitutional amendment before voters — and the measure was therefore lost.
The Senate gave notice that reconsideration may be filed at the appropriate time; floor leaders said they will continue to work through remaining business on the calendar.
The outcome leaves probate judges elected on the party ballot in place for now; any future effort to change that result would require renewed floor action and a two-thirds vote in both chambers before going to voters.
