Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Suicide Prevention Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board reviews rewritten suicide awareness and re-entry policy in first reading
Summary
The board received a first reading of a substantially revised suicide awareness, prevention and response policy that expands definitions, integrates threat-assessment and crisis-response teams, extends staff training expectations, references the Safe2Say program, and adds procedures for student re-entry; members asked for administrative regulations clarifying timelines and documentation.
The policy committee presented a comprehensive rewrite of Policy 8/19 (suicide awareness, prevention and response). The updated draft expands definitions, integrates threat assessment and crisis response teams, outlines staff training expectations across grade spans, references the Safe2Say program, tightens privacy language to reflect law, and expands the district's list of crisis resources.
"You can see language that integrated threat assessment and crisis response teams into this policy," Director Walker said during the first-read discussion, praising committee work and administration’s input. The revised policy also added more detail about staff training expectations and safety-planning and clarified how the district will respond when a student is at risk or returning after a behavioral health crisis.
Board members asked specific questions about the Safe2Say program’s applicability (noting Safe2Say is primarily used for grades 7–12), the timing and scope of curriculum changes for middle-school grades, and how re-entry procedures would be scheduled and documented. Administrators said re-entry processes would be conducted "prior to a student coming back" when possible, but they intentionally used language requiring "reasonable efforts" so that lack of immediate family availability would not bar a student’s return; administrative regulations and supporting documentation are being drafted to implement the policy.
Members also asked about forms documenting family choices and the district’s ability to note a guardian’s decision not to participate in transition planning; staff said the district would expand sign-off forms and documentation to record outcomes. The board did not adopt the policy at this meeting; the first read concluded with a plan to prepare implementing regulations and to bring a revised draft for a second reading.
