Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Residents urge caution on Thomas Place street vacation, citing parking and density concerns
Summary
A resident opposed planned apartment development tied to a proposed vacation of Thomas Place, urging the planning board to scrutinize parking and scale; council members clarified the council’s role is limited to vacating the street and that site plans still require planning-board review.
A resident urged council members on March 23 to reconsider the effect of a proposed apartment development tied to a street vacation on Thomas Place, saying the neighborhood cannot absorb the additional parking demand.
"I just don't see how this is going to work…it's just not feasible," said Janice Kasmar of 33 Albert Avenue during the work-session public comment period. Kasmar said nearby streets already host overflow parking from Redfield Village and questioned where new parking…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
