Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Meeting Procedures topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Springdale council reviews meeting rules, keeps public comment at start and sets minutes protocol
Summary
At a April 3 work session, the Springdale Town Council reviewed its meeting rules and code of conduct and directed staff to draft revisions. The council agreed public comment will remain at the start of meetings, be comments-only (three minutes), and that written materials the public wants entered into the permanent minutes must be sponsored by a council member.
SPRINGDALE, Utah — The Springdale Town Council met April 3 in a work session at the Canyon Community Center to review the town's rules of procedure and code of conduct and to give staff direction on possible revisions.
Tom Danzy, the staff contact for the item, opened the meeting by recounting the legal baseline: "the state law requires um all public bodies to adopt rules of procedure for the operation of their meetings," and explained the town's current rules date to 2012 with a meeting-procedure update in March 2023. He framed the session as a non-decisional review to identify areas for revision and to guide staff drafting.
The most concrete operational outcome from the session was a council consensus on public participation. After extended discussion about whether council or staff should answer audience questions during the meeting, the council agreed that the public-comment period will stay at the beginning of meetings, remain open to any topic (including agenda items), be limited to three minutes per speaker and be a comment period only — not a forum for on-the-spot deliberation. "I say no," Councilmember Pat Campbell said when asked whether staff should be required to answer every question on the spot; Mayor Barbara Bruno summarized the group's decision: "The comment period is a comment period only. It's still a three minute max."
Councilmembers and staff also addressed how written materials offered by members of the public should be treated. The council agreed that public speakers's remarks will be part of the official record, but any supplemental written materials citizens want entered into the permanent minutes should be added only if a council member sponsors that addition during the meeting.
Other guidance the council gave staff included:
- Meeting packet handling: large or substantive contract corrections should be routed to staff ahead of a meeting for cleanup or pulled until corrected; minor grammatical fixes may be handled during the meeting.
- Staff contact expectations: community development has a dedicated "office hours" slot on the last Thursday of the month for in-depth consultations; routine, non-emergency questions sent outside business hours should not be expected to receive an immediate reply, while urgent matters should be flagged (for example by text or an "urgent" subject line). Councilmembers asked that staff responses to constituent emails be copied to the council so members can track follow-ups.
- Records requests: staff clarified the town's Government Records Access and Management Act (GRAMA) practice: certified records personnel handle GRAMA requests, redactions and citations follow state law, and the town keeps a records-request log.
- Chain of command and staff direction: the council reiterated that individual council members should not give direction to staff on behalf of the public body without express authority; for performance or personnel concerns members should consult the town manager, while routine project questions may go to the designated staff contact or to the council liaison for that department.
The council also discussed whether the rules should require members to wait until recognized by the mayor before speaking. Members agreed that language was overly formal for the way this council currently operates and directed staff to soften or remove that provision in the draft code of conduct while retaining clear civility expectations. The body noted annual training obligations (ethics, open meetings, public records) and debated whether to set a fixed clock for reviewing the rules; no firm timeline was adopted, and members said statutory changes would trigger an immediate review when necessary.
No binding ordinances or resolutions were adopted at the work session. The council directed staff to incorporate the edits and return a revised draft for formal consideration at a future meeting. Mayor Barbara Bruno closed the session by thanking members for a wide-ranging discussion and calling for a motion to adjourn; the meeting ended by motion and second.
