Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Comment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents press board on Mara Fork site, EMS response times and persistent drainage
Summary
During public comment residents raised concerns about the Mara Fork dumpster site’s timber bidding and erosion, reported delays and volunteer retention issues at rescue squads, and urged elevation/ditch work on local roads; board members acknowledged the concerns and staff said they would follow up.
Several residents used the public‑comment period to raise localized concerns.
Lee Walton questioned the process and advertising for timber bids associated with the Mara Fork dumpster site, saying the posted bid appeared low for the land and that erosion‑control measures (silt fencing and skirting) were poorly installed; Walton asked for better transparency on the bidding process and remediation at the site.
Frank Rosen of Willis (Indian Valley District) described a personal experience waiting for rescue response and reported that volunteer rescue personnel have disengaged because paid crews have sometimes kept units in‑service for calls that volunteers might have handled. Rosen urged a review of rescue‑squad coverage and volunteer recruitment/retention to reduce response times to remote locations.
A resident identified as Chip (Little River District) described recurring drainage and pothole problems on Sandy Flats and nearby sections and asked the board to prioritize a “standard class” upgrade in the county’s six‑year road plan; he said repeated grading had not solved recurring ponding and ditches need permanent reform.
Board members and staff acknowledged the comments and asked staff to follow up on bidding documentation for the Mara Fork site, to review rescue‑squad coverage and volunteer coordination, and to confirm timelines for road work and the six‑year plan.
