Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Economic Development topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council votes to pursue up to $6M brownfield remediation grant for 100 Franklin Drive; Penrose identified as prospective developer

City of Torington City Council / Ordinance Committee · March 17, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Council authorized staff to apply for a brownfield remediation grant (Resolution 143-288) for the 100 Franklin Drive site in partnership with New Colony Development Corporation; Penrose and The Cloud Company are prospective developers and members stressed need for a future fiscal analysis and any tax agreement would return to council for approval.

The council voted to authorize submission of Resolution 143-288, a brownfield remediation grant application up to $6 million, for the 100 Franklin Drive project. William (economic development director) explained that since an earlier 2025 application the maximum DCD brownfield grant limit rose from $4 million to $6 million and new environmental data indicate remediation of the site could approach $6 million.

William said the city’s prior $200,000 brownfield award helped produce a path to ownership, a capital stack and a developer. New Colony Development Corporation (Brownfield Land Bank) would hold liability during cleanup, and Penrose and The Cloud Company are the developers the city engaged through an RFQ process. William outlined a tentative timeline: grant award in June, contract access in roughly six months (funds available ~December), about 12 months for remediation, and possible redevelopment starting in January 2028 pending financing and approvals.

Council members pressed for fuller fiscal analysis before committing to any tax-abatement negotiations. Several councilors said the application does not legally bind the city to a future tax agreement or to Penrose, but it does require evidence of a credible path to ownership and a developer to be competitive for the grant. The council voted to submit the application; members asked staff to return with a detailed presentation on the prior Penrose riverfront project’s net fiscal impacts (service costs, tax revenues, school impacts) before any binding decisions on abatements.

Next steps: Staff will file the grant application by the March deadline and prepare the requested fiscal-impact presentation for council review prior to any tax-agreement deliberation.