Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Emergency Services topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Edgar County board moves to negotiate after 911 board withholds dispatch payment
Summary
County attorneys and board members said the Edgar County 911 Board withheld a roughly $48,000–$49,800 quarterly dispatch payment over personnel complaints and that the county will form a committee to seek a negotiated intergovernmental agreement and a prompt payment.
Edgar County Board members on Wednesday discussed a dispute with the Edgar County 911 Board after the latter voted to withhold a quarterly reimbursement intended to cover the county’s share of dispatch services.
Phillip, who prepared a memorandum on the matter and drafted a response letter, told the board the 911 panel cited personnel and leadership complaints at the county sheriff’s dispatch office as the reason for withholding the payment. He said the 911 board had increased its quarterly payment from about $33,000 to roughly $48,000–$49,800 and then declined to pay the final quarter, leaving the county temporarily out of pocket.
“The 911 board’s letter essentially said they withheld payment based on personnel complaints,” Phillip said, and he recommended the county separate internal personnel issues from the revenue question. “The 911 board can’t lawfully withhold payments for services already rendered as leverage over internal Edgar County Sheriff’s Office HR matters,” he added.
Other members noted at least one internal investigation had been completed and emphasized the county must protect employees’ rights while addressing the 911 board’s operational concerns. A board member said the county would send representatives to the next 911 board meeting to demonstrate a willingness to work toward resolution.
The board agreed to assemble a small committee—recommended to include at least two county board members and the state’s attorney—to prepare the county’s response, negotiate a formal intergovernmental agreement governing future payments, and pursue timely payment for the disputed quarter. The committee was to be named quickly so a response letter could be approved and sent before the 911 board’s next meeting.
Several members also discussed legal options if informal negotiation fails. Phillip told the board he had not threatened litigation in his draft letter and that his focus was on collaboration and reaching an agreement that would prevent future disputes.
The board left the item with direction to finalize a committee membership, circulate the draft response to the 911 board, and attend the next 911 meeting to press for payment and a path forward.
