Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Parcel Evaluation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Chair previews new online mapping tool as committee sets parcel-evaluation process and admits one additional applicant

Clay County Land Conservation Committee · March 17, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Clay County Land Conservation Committee reviewed a demonstration of a new GIS mapping tool tied to its parcel score sheet, agreed members will pre-fill scores before the April meeting, and approved allowing one late applicant into the current intake cycle.

The Clay County Land Conservation Committee reviewed a new online mapping tool and agreed how it will use the map and score sheet to evaluate three practice parcels before bringing recommendations to the board.

The chair demonstrated an internal GIS map that pairs public data layers with each criterion on the committee’s score sheet, showing layers for protected species (red-cockaded woodpecker, eagle nests), water-supply wells (public and private), habitat priorities and Florida Forever boundaries. The chair said she would email members a direct link to the map, the rubric (score sheet) and a table that maps each scoring criterion to the data layer staff used to support it.

Why it matters: the map is intended to make individual scoring more consistent and speed committee deliberations. Committee members agreed it would be more efficient to pre-fill their score sheets and bring them to the April meeting rather than starting from scratch during meetings.

Committee members asked staff how valuation information will be handled. Staff warned that county tax-assessed values are not the same as a certified appraisal and said formal appraisals or comparable sales will typically be provided later in the process when staff or consultants negotiate with landowners.

The committee also discussed data sources that could be added to the map. Members suggested public-facing tools such as the Department of Transportation’s environmental screening layers and regional natural-resources inventories; staff said public data layers can be incorporated when they help answer a scoring criterion.

Action taken: members agreed to pre-fill scores on the three practice parcels and return in April to discuss and vote on whether to advance any of them to the priority pool for board consideration. The chair said staff will send the map link and supporting documentation and will follow up with property owners as needed.

The meeting concluded with scheduling reminders for May and June steps (May: committee votes to advance parcels into the program; June: contractor analyses and prioritization for board referral).