Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Curriculum topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board hears first reading to add climate literacy to associate degree requirements

Board of Governors, California Community Colleges · March 30, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The chancellor’s office presented proposed Title 5 amendments to weave climate literacy and human impacts into natural science associate degree requirements; the Academic Senate and many board members strongly supported the change and a public hearing was held.

The Board of Governors opened a first reading and public hearing on proposed Title 5 amendments to incorporate climate literacy and the study of human impacts on the environment into the natural science portion of associate degree requirements.

Staff said the change grew out of Vision 2030 and the Chancellor’s Office Climate Action Work Plan; the Academic Senate passed model language and 5C (Curriculum Committee) recommended the adoption. Visiting executive Jenny May and Senior Adviser Carla Grandandy described language changes that would clarify natural science learning outcomes to include scientific inquiry about climate and human impact.

Board members across political and regional lines praised the proposal, describing it as a systemwide step to ensure every program prepares students with basic climate literacy and practical skills for evolving careers. Several trustees emphasized intersections with environmental justice, workforce pathways, and data collection for local impact. The Academic Senate’s representative and other public speakers — including the Academic Senate chair — expressed support during the public hearing.

Staff said the proposed language remains under a 45‑day public comment review and will return for a second reading. Board members asked whether the phrase “may include” should be stronger ("shall include") — a change some commenters requested — and staff said they would consider public input before final language is proposed.

Next step: a second reading and any regulatory revisions in response to public comment.