Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Code Enforcement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Resident accuses neighbor and borough of permitting failures after chronic drainage, erosion
Summary
Ronald Vogal presented photos and documents at public comment alleging that a neighbor's landscaping and permitted work altered grading and caused ongoing drainage and erosion on his property; borough officials said earlier permits predated the current administration and recommended escalation to state agencies or courts.
Get email alerts on the Code Enforcement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
At public comment on Sept. 17, resident Ronald Vogal of 16 Horizon Terrace urged the borough to resolve a years-long drainage and erosion problem he attributes to a neighbor's landscaping and permitting work.
Vogal displayed photographs and described a 40-foot pear tree whose roots washed away in recent rains. He said his property now receives persistent runoff and accused the boroughconstruction and permitting process of failing to prevent or correct the condition. "I have facts, not fiction," he said, pressing the council for relief and asserting the work changed contours and increased runoff toward his land.
Mayor Lane and other officials responded that many of the permits in question were issued before the current administration and that the borough had previously referred the matter to the construction board of appeals or other bodies. The mayor said he had hired new building officials since taking office and urged Vogal to escalate any licensing or code-official errors to the state or pursue civil remedies if he believes an improper permit issued. Council members also urged Mr. Vogal to call police immediately if he observes unlawful activity rather than relying on later reports.
Councilmembers and staff noted technical limits on the boroughauthority: they explained that the state regulates licensure of construction officials and that retrospective relief may require formal appeal or litigation. One council member asked administration to make the record available and to follow up with any outstanding enforcement steps.
The council did not take formal action during the meeting but said it would accept submitted documentation and suggested procedural paths (appeal to state licensing, code-enforcement review, or court) for further redress.

