Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Open Government topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Adrian HRC receives briefing on Open Meetings Act and FOIA; staff stresses limits on deliberation and use of devices
Summary
City staff briefed members of the Adrian Human Relations Commission on Michigan's Open Meetings Act and FOIA, stressing that the advisory body cannot make binding financial decisions, that deliberations outside noticed meetings are prohibited, and that communications on personal devices used for city business may be public records.
City staff briefed new Human Relations Commission members on the Open Meetings Act and the Michigan Freedom of Information Act and described limits on the commission’s authority and acceptable communications practices.
A staff presenter told members the HRC is an advisory, coordinating body that cannot obligate the city to contracts or financial commitments. The presenter explained that a quorum meeting for deliberation must be properly noticed and open to the public, and that commissioners should avoid back-and-forth discussions in small groups, passing messages to reach a majority, or making decisions through text, email or social media. The presenter warned that records created on personal devices while conducting city business may be subject to public-records requests.
Key guidance included: submit agenda items through the chair and vice chair (with a memo explaining rationale), copy staff so materials can be posted; allow public comment but avoid on-the-spot commitments from the dais; consider time limits and dedicated public hearings for large community input; and distribute an orientation packet that includes the Open Meetings Act handbook, city ethics code, the proposed bylaws draft and the city ordinance text (section 3831).
Why it matters: The legal and procedural briefing sets conduct expectations for commissioners and clarifies the HRC’s advisory role and limits. Members agreed to receive the packet before their next meeting and to coordinate possible special meetings to complete bylaws review.
Staff offered follow-up tasks: circulate the bylaws draft and ordinance copy to commissioners, confirm whether the bylaws went through prior review, and post scheduled meetings and contact information on the city website. The commission also discussed using a city-managed email or administrator-forwarded address for public inquiries to ensure consistent routing and timely staff responses.
