Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Employment Law At Will topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Professor Rhonda Reeves: what Florida workers and employers should know about at‑will employment and misclassification

Media interview with Professor Rhonda Reeves · April 2, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Professor Rhonda Reeves explained that most Florida employees are "at‑will," outlined exceptions such as anti‑discrimination and whistleblower protections, described how remote work complicates old statutes, and warned small businesses about misclassifying contractors and wage‑and‑hour exposure.

Professor Rhonda Reeves, a law professor, said most Florida employees who do not have a contract are "at‑will," meaning an employer can end employment for any reason or no reason so long as that reason is not illegal. "What at‑will means is that for most of us, we work without a contract," Reeves said.

Reeves described key exceptions to at‑will status, naming anti‑discrimination protections (for example, race, disability and religion) and public‑policy protections such as whistleblower statutes. She noted that contractual promises of "just cause" and academic tenure can also limit an employer's ability to fire staff. "You can always, if you're lucky enough to find an employer that'll give you a definite contract that says they won't fire you unless they have cause," she said.

On remote and hybrid work, Reeves said many workplace laws were enacted decades ago and may not easily address 21st‑century practices. "Some of the laws we're enforcing were passed in 1938… some of them were passed in the 1960s," she said, adding that employers and policymakers are assessing whether existing statutes are flexible enough or whether new rules are needed.

Reeves warned small businesses to be cautious about treating individuals as independent contractors. "It's not based on what you think or even what the document says. It's based on how you control what they do," she said, explaining that misclassification claims arise when the reality of supervision and control looks like an employment relationship. She added that misclassification can expose businesses to unpaid wages, benefits, and penalties.

On wage‑and‑hour enforcement, Reeves highlighted that short periods of uncompensated work can accumulate into larger claims. "Those 15 minutes add up," she said, noting that such practices can form the basis of class claims affecting many workers.

Reeves urged businesses to have policies and contracts reviewed by legal counsel when possible, and mentioned business groups and bar associations as referral sources. She acknowledged the cost tradeoff: attorneys can be expensive up front, but litigation is often costlier. The interview concluded with Reeves summarizing that review and clear policies can reduce exposure for both employers and employees.

The interview did not identify any specific Florida statutes by citation; Reeves referred generally to "Florida law" and to whistleblower protections without naming particular statutes. She also used approximate examples from practice (for example, short unpaid intervals and class claims) rather than citing specific case names or statutes. The next practical step for listeners is to consult counsel or local bar resources for tailored advice.