Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Measure Q G topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

San Bruno council gives direction on Measure Q bond plan and Measure G spending priorities

San Bruno City Council · March 11, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Council directed staff to include a FY26 Measure Q spending plan that emphasizes pavement management and initial fire station design and endorsed a Measure G spending plan focused on communications, illegal-dumping mitigation, street-light retrofit and wildfire mitigation.

City staff presented a combined plan for Measure Q (2024 general-obligation bond authorized for pavement, storm water and fire stations) and Measure G (half-cent sales tax) and asked the council for guidance on a FY26 spending plan.

Nick Feros, the city’s administrative services director and CFO, said staff is recommending a $12 million Measure Q FY26 program composed of roughly $9 million for the pavement management program, $1 million for storm-water projects and $2 million to begin design and planning for Fire Station 52. He cautioned that Measure Q is a bonded program and that bond issuances must be timed to meet cash-flow and the legal constraint that roughly 85% of bond proceeds be spent on construction within three years of issuance.

Council members debated how aggressive to be in the first bond tranche (staff modeled issuing roughly $17.5 million in the first issuance and spending $12 million in FY26) and emphasized delivery capacity; several members said they want to increase storm-water investment in subsequent years if delivery capacity allows. Vice Mayor Marty Medina and Council member Alvarez urged staff to model higher storm-water spending in later tranches and to seek clarity on matching or grant opportunities.

On Measure G, the revenue measure oversight committee reported a 3–2 concurrence with staff’s recommended spending plan; committee members and public commenters urged a strong pavement program but recognized Measure Q was intended to fund most paving. Council provided consensus direction to include community communications/engagement, illegal-dumping mitigation and median maintenance, a street-light retrofit, wildfire mitigation and select other priorities in the Measure G FY26 plan, while reserving the ability to refine dollar amounts during the CIP process.

Members of the public and oversight committee members repeatedly urged the council to preserve a robust pavement program and to be transparent about how one-time community benefit funds (related to a large retailer/YouTube/Google transaction discussed by multiple speakers) are being allocated. The Measure G oversight committee chair recommended that council proceed with the staff-proposed Measure Q allocation of $9 million for paving in FY26 so the paving program is funded regardless of Measure G decisions.

Council asked staff to continue refining the bond issuance schedule and to explore a potential partnership with the San Bruno Community Foundation on the fire-station project; staff said final decisions on issuance size and timing would follow further analysis and the bond-market timing later in the year.