Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Core Academic Requirements topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Task force split over algebra II requirement and proposed reduction of science credits
Summary
Task‑force members debated whether to require algebra II (or an equivalent integrated math sequence) and whether to cut science credits from four to three; counselors, teachers and industry representatives warned about college, career and equity impacts, while proponents argued for flexibility tied to clear equivalency standards.
Task‑force members spent the second half of the meeting debating changes to core academic requirements, focusing on two contested ideas: whether algebra II should remain an explicit requirement and whether science credits should be reduced from four to three.
Miss Selby, an online expert cited by staff, recommended clarity about equivalency: if algebra II is dropped as a named requirement, an "integrated math 3" or another course that demonstrably includes algebraic reasoning should be specified as the equivalent. She told members that algebraic reasoning underpins many technology and STEM pathways and that any substitute must contain those baseline skills.
Opponents, including college counselors and experienced teachers, warned that removing an algebra II requirement would likely reduce course offerings in some schools and could disadvantage students who lack access to higher‑level math. Laura, representing teachers, cautioned that "the second you remove a requirement, DCPS removes courses from our classrooms and teachers lose their jobs and students lose access." Counselors and college advisers said many colleges expect algebra II (or higher) for STEM admission and that late changes to a student's course sequence can close doors.
On science, AIE proposed reducing required credits from four to three (two lab sciences, one of them biology). Several members pushed back, arguing chemistry or physics should be required for students headed to health or technical fields. Evette said chemistry "is the gateway course for many professions, especially in the health field," and urged retention of chemistry as an option among required lab sciences.
Members proposed several mitigations: specify acceptable equivalent courses rather than a vague "or equivalent" phrase; create testing or competency pathways (credit by exam) for students who decide late to pursue a STEM career; and require the agency to help assure access across LEAs through hubs, dual enrollment or online options. The math task force that AIE has convened was cited as a partner for defining equivalency.
No final votes were taken. The co‑chairs said staff would synthesize the discussion, return revised language that specifies acceptable equivalents and document concerns for the draft report.
