Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Administration topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Rent Control Board tightens rules for filing rent‑adjustment petitions, adopts explicit timelines
Summary
The board adopted amendments to Regulations 403 and 405 to clarify that petitions are not deemed filed until staff determine they are complete and to require the hearings manager to determine completeness within 10 working days and mail notice within five working days after acceptance for filing.
Get email alerts on the Administration topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Santa Monica Rent Control Board voted March 12 to revise regulations that govern how rent‑adjustment petitions are submitted, reviewed and administratively dismissed. Staff told the board current language is contradictory about when a petition is "filed"; the revisions clarify that a petition is not deemed filed until staff have reviewed and determined it is complete.
Under the substitute language adopted by the board, upon the board27s receipt of a petition the hearings department manager (or designate) must determine within 10 working days whether the petition is complete under applicable regulations. If the manager determines the petition is complete, the manager must accept it for filing and, within five working days, mail a notice of the date of filing to the parties; for rent‑decrease petitions, notice to the landlord must include a copy of the petition.
Commissioners debated whether the 10‑working‑day period belongs in the initial subsection or later in the procedure and discussed how the timing interacts with notices and subsequent scheduling. The hearings manager explained the review is typically an interactive, short process in which staff work with petitioners to correct errors and often includes a resubmission window.
Vice Chair Ambry moved to adopt the proposed amendments; Commissioner Ganska offered a substitute motion that incorporated the 10‑working‑day determination window and the five‑working‑day notice requirement. The substitute motion, seconded by Commissioner Lesley, passed on a roll‑call vote. The board directed staff to implement the clarified procedures.
Staff said the objective of the changes is to provide a clear filing date, reduce confusion for petitioners and parties, and align the regulations with current practice while imposing explicit timeframes to increase procedural certainty.

