Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Personnel It Position topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Grand Island board debates hiring full‑time IT operator, weighs contract changes
Summary
At a workshop the Grand Island Town Board discussed creating a PO7 computer-operator/IT position to handle routine troubleshooting, advisory‑board meeting support and website maintenance. Members disagreed on full‑time vs. part‑time staffing, union/civil‑service implications and whether to reduce hours billed by contractor Lynx.
Grand Island — The Town Board spent the bulk of its workshop debating whether to create a new computer-operator/IT position to handle routine troubleshooting, meetings support, website maintenance and advisory‑board liaison work.
A council member proposed a 40‑hour PO7 information-technology role to provide continuity for evening advisory‑board meetings and day‑to‑day ticket handling, arguing town staff have been stretched and the arrangement would reduce reliance on outside contractors. “I think we need somebody in-house so we don't have to rely on the town board or volunteers for simple tech issues,” the council member said during the workshop.
Opponents warned a full‑time hire would substantially increase personnel costs once retirement and health benefits are included. One speaker estimated that converting a $50,000 annual wage into a full‑time town position could double the cost when benefits are counted. Members discussed starting part‑time and scaling up if workload justifies it.
The group also discussed contract tradeoffs with the town’s current IT vendor (referred to in the discussion as both “Lynx” and “Links”). Board members cited a range of out‑of‑contract hourly rates — roughly $75/hour for limited troubleshooting and higher all‑in rates for extensive services — and suggested that an in‑house operator handling first‑level tickets would lower the contractor’s billable hours. One council member said that between existing budgeted amounts (covering Aaron’s prior hours and a half‑position) the town could plausibly cover a new hire without a major immediate gap.
Union and civil‑service issues were a central concern. Board members noted that if the duties have previously been performed by a union position, civil‑service rules could require the job to be posted to an eligible list. A speaker said the next step would be to request Human Resources to pull the civil‑service list for the appropriate classification so the board can determine hiring options.
No final hiring decision was recorded at the workshop. Board members agreed to move forward with generating a civil‑service list and interviewing candidates: “If we don't decide today to at least pull the list, we're another meeting behind,” one member said.
What’s next: The board intends to have HR pull any civil‑service list for the computer‑operator title and to begin candidate outreach; the transcript did not record a formal vote approving a hire.
Quotes are attributed to council members and the chair as indicated in the public workshop transcript; speakers were not always identified by name in the record.
