Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Exemption From Instruction topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Policy update would let parents cite "sincerely held" religious or moral beliefs to opt children out of specific instruction

Pittsburgh School District Policy Committee · March 10, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The committee reviewed revisions to Policy 104.2 that add the phrase "sincerely held religious and/or moral beliefs," require annual notice and written requests to opt students out of specific instruction, and instruct the district to develop procedures for advance notice to families.

Policy 104.2 was presented March 10 with statutory language requiring school districts to permit parents and guardians to request that students be excused from specific instruction that conflicts with the parents' or students' "sincerely held religious and/or moral beliefs." Elizabeth Satler said the change adds the words "sincerely held and/or moral" to the policy and requires the district to develop procedures to implement the policy, including reasonable, realistic advanced notice to parents and guardians when instruction may conflict with those beliefs.

Satler and board members discussed how the policy works in practice. Director Walker asked how district staff would determine whether a belief is "sincerely held." Satler said the policy relies in practice on a written request submitted by the parent or guardian and that, in many cases, families who have these beliefs monitor the curriculum; she characterized determinations as largely handled on a case-by-case or honor-system basis and said administration would provide procedural detail. The policy requires staff to provide reasonable alternative activities for the student but does not require the district to spend additional funds to create those alternatives.

No vote was taken; the revision will be posted for the 30-day review and could be considered at the April legislative meeting.