Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Real Estate topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Bakersfield council approves refundable deposit for downtown property after heated debate
Summary
The council approved consent item 7H3 to move forward with a refundable earnest deposit tied to a possible purchase of property at Truxton Avenue; dissenting council members questioned timing and a $14 million purchase price before water and other larger capital needs were resolved.
After pulling consent item 7H3 for separate consideration, Bakersfield council members debated whether to appropriate funds for a refundable earnest deposit related to a potential purchase and lease of property at 1430–1440 Truxton Avenue.
City staff said the sum being appropriated is a refundable deposit to enter a due‑diligence period for a previously authorized purchase/lease option; if the city later decides not to move forward, the deposit would be returned. Staff said occupying the building and capturing lease revenue would reduce the city’s annual office lease costs and could produce about $1 million in annual operating savings versus continuing to lease external office space.
Council members pushed back. One member asked bluntly why the city would consider a roughly $14 million purchase while the city faces budgetary constraints and a water infrastructure problem requiring major funding. “It just doesn’t add up,” a council member said, questioning tenant demand, condition and renovation costs for the building. Another member called for more objective outside information and cautioned against following a sales pitch without independent verification.
Council member Arius moved to approve staff’s recommendation to appropriate the refundable deposit and proceed with the due‑diligence step; Council member Weir moved to deny. The motion to approve staff’s recommendation passed, with Council members Weir and Basher voting no.
What it means: The vote authorizes moving forward with the refundable deposit and due diligence; it does not commit the city to closing on a purchase. Staff said the deposit would preserve the city’s place in the due‑diligence period and that the deposit is refundable if the purchase does not proceed.
What’s next: Staff will return with the requested documentation and terms of any purchase and sale agreement, and council members who opposed the action said they expect more detailed financial work and independent analysis before any final purchase is completed.
