Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Edtech Security topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Canvas incident prompts district discussion of alternatives including Google Classroom
Summary
After an unclear Canvas incident and an outage, Quakertown Community SD staff told committees they cannot confirm whether district data were exposed; the incident has intensified discussion about moving to Google Classroom or other platforms and using teacher PD and pilots to assess migration work and integration with PowerSchool.
Get email alerts on the Edtech Security topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Concerns about a recent Canvas security incident and a subsequent outage prompted Quakertown Community SD committee members on May 11 to press staff for clarity and to consider alternatives such as Google Classroom or Schoology.
A committee member asked staff for a synopsis of what happened with Canvas. "To full transparency, they've been very cryptic and not providing much information," the staff member said, adding the district has not yet confirmed its data was included in the hacker group's document. "Other districts in the county and state were on it, but we were not," the staff member said.
Committee members reported two separate incidents: an initial breach report and then a more significant outage. One member suggested the district could seek contractual relief if the vendor’s disclosures remain insufficient. "If they can't keep our data safe ... there's no meaningful difference or differentiation of the software platform amongst other alternatives," a committee member said.
Committee discussion reviewed teacher survey results collected after the incident. Staff said the district’s Canvas expense is roughly $36,000 annually and that responses were mixed: some teachers said they could move to Google Classroom or other platforms, while others said they had invested substantial time building courses and feared the work required to migrate.
Dr. Hoffman said staff will explore pilot options, provide materials for teachers to review Google Classroom and use scheduled professional development time to offer voluntary setup sessions. Staff also noted third‑party conversion tools exist but reviews are mixed and some manual work may be required.
Committee members asked about integration with the district gradebook and PowerSchool. Dr. Hoffman said some connections exist but cautioned that speed‑grading and other features may not replicate perfectly and manual steps may be required.
A board member also asked about artificial‑intelligence features in Google Classroom, noting Google’s Gemini integration is visible in the product; Dr. Hoffman said she would note that for follow up and potential policy discussion.
Next steps: staff will continue fact finding with the vendor and the district’s insurance broker, explore pilot and teacher‑support options for alternate platforms, and bring recommended actions to the board if staff conclude a change is warranted.

