Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Park Investment Cip topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Minnetonka staff preview park investment plan and trail rehabilitation schedule; board raises signage and neighborhood outreach concerns
Summary
Staff outlined the city’s park investment/CIP approach and trail rehab priorities, noting a 2001 $15 million bond funded earlier work and that current plans schedule playground and trail overlays across 2027–2031; board members pressed for clearer neighborhood outreach and consistent crossing signage.
City staff briefed the Park Board on the park investment program, playground replacement scheduling and the trail rehabilitation plan that will feed into the 2027–2031 capital improvement program.
"Back in 2001, there was a $15,000,000 bond referendum passed by Minnetonka residents for park renewal and open space," staff member Darren said, describing the historical investment that completed master plans for 25 parks and led to the current maintenance and rehabilitation funding approach. Darren said the city now uses the CIP to fund ongoing playground replacements, athletic‑field and infrastructure repairs and trail overlays on a multi‑year schedule.
Darren provided a multi‑year list of playground replacements (Groveland, Sunrise Ridge, Orchard, Wilson planned this year; other parks scheduled through 2030) and said the city generally keeps the existing playground footprints and equipment counts when performing like‑for‑like replacements. For large, clean‑slate park projects (master plans) the city solicits neighborhood feedback to shape new layouts; for in‑place replacements the available space often constrains options.
On trails, staff said the city inventories surface type, age, ownership and condition in GIS and uses a trail‑rating app to capture photos and condition scores. "We have 12 miles of gravel trails, 30 miles of concrete sidewalks, and 48 miles of asphalt trails," Darren said, and described planned rehabilitation segments and overlays (County Road 62 segments, Hillaway Road, Orchard Road and others) on a rolling schedule.
Board members asked about inconsistent crossing signage and whether trail crossings under the park district or state jurisdiction have the same stop/crossing signage as city crossings; staff said signing and enforcement vary by owner (Three Rivers, county or state) and committed to investigate consistency where the city has control or influence.
Funding for park investments and trail rehab comes from park dedication fees (development‑linked), franchise fees for building new trails and other CIP allocations; staff noted some local add‑ons such as utility burial may be charged to the city when partners request them.
What happens next: the CIP (2027–2031) draft will be presented to the board in May and returned in June for a final recommendation to the city council; staff will continue to refine project lists, confirm vendors and follow up on signage consistency research.
