Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Tax Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council member Gardner moves repeal of Aurora's 5% retail marijuana excise tax to study session

Aurora City Management and Finance Policy Committee · March 26, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Council Member Gardner sponsored a proposal to repeal Aurora's 5% retail marijuana excise tax, which staff say generates about $574,000 annually; council agreed to move the item to a study session and requested a fiscal note addressing a roughly $500,000 fund shortfall that supports recreation centers and transportation projects.

Council Member Gardner introduced a proposal to repeal Aurora's 5% retail marijuana excise tax, saying the tax — levied on cultivations' gross sales — generates about $574,000 annually but may be driving cultivations out of the city.

Trevor, a staff presenter, said a mid-year implementation in 2026 would have an estimated revenue impact of $287,000. He and Gardner said industry feedback shows cultivations view the 5% excise as a competitive disadvantage compared with nearby Denver, which does not have an excise tax.

Staff and council members discussed fiscal trade-offs. Jeff and Greg (staff) said removing roughly $500,000 in excise revenue would eliminate the marijuana fund's reserve that currently backs two recreation centers and transportation capital projects, leaving the city without that cushion. Greg said the five-year pro forma had been counting on those funds; without them, planned additions to capital funds would be lost.

Gardner said he has discussed the fiscal note and potential offsets with the city manager and the mayor pro tem; he proposed moving the repeal to a study session so staff can prepare a fiscal note and identify budget adjustments before formal consideration. The committee agreed to send the item to a study session; Gardner will coordinate timing and the fiscal analysis with staff.

No vote was taken; the committee requested a fiscal note and additional details on how to address the shortfall before the proposal returns for further consideration.