Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Venue Complaints topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Resident Jose Flores urges Brookfield to pursue license revocation for nearby event venue after alleged repeated violations
Summary
At the Sept. 8 Village of Brookfield meeting, resident Jose Flores and another attendee described years of noise, public-drinking and other alleged violations at an events venue at 9105–9109 Ardan Avenue and pressed the board to revoke the business license; the board recorded routine votes on warrants and a zoning variance.
Jose Flores, identifying himself during public comment, urged the Village of Brookfield to pursue revocation of a nearby event venue’s business license, alleging repeated noise, underage drinking and other public-safety and nuisance problems dating to 2020.
Flores said the venue, described in the record as Creative Party Packages Plus and a separately operated event space at 9105–9109 Ardan Avenue, held events with loud music and alleged incidents of public urination, marijuana use and underage drinking. He told the board he observed on Sept. 5 what he believed were four or five cases of beer being unloaded into the venue and reported the incident to police, who were unable to confirm entry with alcohol. “When is the next party revocation happening?” Flores asked the board.
A second resident, who did not give a formal title in the record, presented photographs and a timeline of reported incidents and said the venue had operated without required permits in the past and was exceeding the conditions of the business license granted earlier this year. That commenter said they had filed multiple police reports and asked the board to take stronger action.
Board members did not take an immediate enforcement vote during the public-comment period. Flores said earlier discussions with village staff indicated that license revocation could follow if license parameters were violated; he said staff had told residents the venue would be subject to penalties if it strayed from prescribed hours and conditions.
The meeting record notes that Flores and the other resident had met with village staff earlier (they referenced a meeting with Tim Wyberg and others) and were encouraged to file formal complaints when possible so allegations could be investigated with identified complainants.
Votes at a glance: during the same meeting, the board approved a corporate warrant dated Sept. 8, 2025, and passed an ordinance granting zoning variations to allow construction of a new garage at 3620 Harrison Avenue (see the ordinance summary in the meeting minutes). No discipline or license-revocation motion for the venue appears in the meeting record.
What happens next: Residents in the public-comment period urged the board to pursue formal enforcement steps; the record indicates staff asked residents to file formal complaints to support investigations. The board did not announce any immediate revocation action or enforcement date during the meeting.
Quote: “We were informed that if the business violated any of the parameters of the business license that we would be able to revoke said license,” Jose Flores said during public comment.
Ending: The board moved on to committee reports after public comment; trustees later approved routine financial warrants and a zoning-variance ordinance before adjourning at 7:02 p.m.
