Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the University Master Plan topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission forwards Westchester University master plan to council, flags student-housing and traffic conditions
Summary
The Western Planning Commission voted to recommend that borough council accept the Westchester University comprehensive campus plan as a conditional-use approval, subject to conditions addressing student-housing demand data, traffic and pedestrian safety (notably High Street and Rosedale), and limiting the approved plan to lands within the PUC district.
On March 9 the Western Planning Commission recommended that borough council grant conditional-use approval for Westchester Universitycomprehensive campus master plan, while attaching several conditions aimed at protecting neighborhood livability and public safety. Commissioners said the recommendation—and its conditions—will be presented to borough council at a public hearing on March 23.
Why it matters: the plan lays out the universityproposed five-year growth and includes studies on enrollment, student housing demand, traffic and parking. Commissioners said the planshould be read as a framework: individual projects will still require separate land-development applications and subsequent commission review.
What the commission asked for
- Limit approved plan boundaries: commissioners required the final master-plan approval to include only properties located within the boroughPUC (university campus) district, and to remove references to properties outside that district to avoid confusion.
- Incorporate technical review comments: the commission asked staff to include findings and implementable recommendations from the urban engineersreview and from the town architect on pedestrian connectivity when land-development applications arrive.
- Study the High Street/Rosedale intersection: multiple commissioners requested that future land-development applications that affect that intersection include an explicit study of pedestrian crossings and vehicle turning movements to address reported safety concerns.
- Annual housing-demand disclosure: commissioners asked the university to provide an annual count or equivalent snapshot of on-campus housing demand (the transcript records a request for an on-campus waiting-list number). Staff cautioned a formal waiting list may not exist and agreed to check university procedures and available data.
Key technical points
- Student beds: the materials and consultant recommendations included a planning target of about 900 additional student housing beds over the plan horizon. Planning staff and consultants said that figure reflects synthesis of multiple studies (including a student housing study by MGT) and that traffic/parking models used conservative enrollment-growth assumptions so the model outputs accommodate the proposed housing in the plan.
- Wayne Hall: commissioners discussed whether Wayne Hall (a building now used for administrative space) could be returned to residential use. Planning consultants said conversion of Wayne Hall to student housing was studied and judged not feasible within the life of this plan, but the commission asked that Wayne Hall be reconsidered in future planning efforts.
Commission action and next steps
The commission read and moved the draft recommendation (the motion was seconded) and recorded that the recommendation and the assembled testimony will be presented to borough council at the March 23 hearing. The transcript does not include a roll-call vote tally in the record provided; staff said the commission's recommendation and conditions will accompany the materials forwarded to council.
What remains unresolved
Commissioners and members of the public asked for additional clarity on exactly how on-campus demand would be measured and whether the universitywould agree to recurring public reporting. Staff said some data exist (application or assignment snapshots) but that the form of a dependable annual statistic would need to be confirmed with university housing administrators.
From the record: the commissionasked staff to ensure the planning recommendation: - limits approval to properties inside the borough's PUC district; - includes urban-engineer and town-architect comments as conditions of future land-development approvals; - asks the university to provide housing-demand snapshots annually or as available; - requests a study of the High/Rosedale intersection in future land-development submissions.
The commission's recommendation will move with these conditions to a borough-council hearing on March 23 for final action.
