Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Police Accountability topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Public Safety committee advances body‑worn camera ‘look‑back’ resolution to full council 4–1
Summary
The Public Safety Committee voted 4–1 to move a resolution requiring a pre‑activation look‑back capability for Akron Police body‑worn cameras to the council for a vote; supporters argued it would aid accountability and exoneration, while one member raised cost and recruitment concerns.
The Public Safety Committee voted 4–1 to advance a resolution that would commit the city to establishing a pre‑activation look‑back requirement for all Akron Police Department body‑worn cameras.
Councilman Garrett, a leading proponent, said the capability would protect officers and provide accountability in contested incidents. "This is not against anyone. This is pro making us better. It's for accountability. It's for exoneration," he said, arguing the community has sought this reform and that other accredited cities have implemented similar practices.
Councilman Lombardo expressed concerns about the expense and potential effects on police recruiting and retention, and urged waiting for the results of a pending use‑of‑force review. Councilwoman Mobley supported the proposal, citing the independent auditor's finding that in over 97% of reviewed cases the auditor concurred with officers' actions, and said a look‑back could exonerate officers in disputed cases.
Council President Somerville moved to bring the resolution out of committee for a vote that evening. A roll call produced McEachern Aye, Kramer Aye, Lombardo Nay, Hanna Aye and Garrett Aye — the motion passed 4 to 1. The committee recorded that the resolution was on its third reading and did not require suspension of the rules to move forward.
