Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Water Well topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commission reviews shared well and fire-suppression proposals for Townsend airport hangar development

Broadwater County airport board ยท March 19, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Contractors from 180 Water and Western Water Wells presented three package options for a shared well, underground infrastructure and optional fire-suppression tanks; the board agreed to review bids and discuss a decision next month.

Contractors representing 180 Water and Western Water Wells presented quotes to the Broadwater County airport board for a shared well, underground plumbing to future hangar sites, pumps and optional fire-suppression tanks.

Tyrell Wellenstein of 180 Water Western Wells outlined a multi-stage approach: drill a primary well (presenters discussed 6-inch and 8-inch casing options), install underground stub bonds/curb stops to each future hangar site, and provide a pump house with freeze protection rather than short-lived in-well pressure tanks. The presenters recommended installing pre-plumbing infrastructure before concrete is poured to avoid costly later digs.

Technical and permitting details discussed included: an 8-inch casing supports larger pumps and higher flow but costs roughly $10 more per foot of casing; the contractors estimated local wells average about 140 feet but planned proposals for up to 200 feet; and a 35-gallon-per-minute threshold was cited as the point at which additional permitting may be required, while a 20โ€“25 gpm system would likely serve the planned hangars without added permitting. Presenters also described optional 5,000-gallon storage tanks sized for fire suppression and said tank counts and capacity could be adjusted based on grants or future needs.

Board members asked about cost-sharing and operational impacts: contractors said some components could be sourced by future building owners to lower up-front board costs but that warranties on pumps would require contractor installation. The board discussed whether individual wells or a single shared well made economic sense; presenters said a single well with curb stops is likely the most economical approach for the expected mix of hangar uses.

The board did not approve a contract; members agreed to review two written proposals and discuss a selection at the next meeting, with Dwight (airport staff) tasked to provide additional details and clarifications.