Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Executive Session topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Lambertville council moves into closed session to discuss health benefits and redeveloper agreement
Summary
At 4:06 p.m. the Lambertville council voted to enter a closed session to discuss attorney–client matters, personnel, potential contracts and litigation under N.J.S.A. 10:4‑12(b)(7) and (8), specifically citing health benefits and proposed edits to the redeveloper agreement with Khubnian.
Get email alerts on the Executive Session topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Lambertville Council recessed its public meeting at 4:06 p.m. and voted to enter a closed session to address attorney–client matters, personnel issues, potential contracts and litigation. The stated purpose included discussion of health benefits and continued review of proposed edits to the redeveloper agreement with Khubnian.
Lindsay read the Open Public Meetings Act compliance statement into the record before the roll call: "This meeting is being held in compliance with the Open Public Meetings Act with the notice provided to the Trenton Times, the Hunter County Democrat, department heads, and members on the list serve. The meeting agenda provides action items known at the time of publication and is subject to change. This meeting is being recorded and streamed live using the Zoom meeting platform." The council then completed roll call and recited the Pledge of Allegiance.
A motion to move into closed session to address the listed attorney–client and personnel matters was made, seconded and approved by voice vote. The motion cited the statutory authority for a closed session under N.J.S.A. 10:4‑12(b)(7) and (8). Council members noted that Councilman Led was participating from another room and was expected to join the closed session. Staff confirmed that members had the separate closed-session Zoom link on their calendars and directed a staff member (Erin) to proceed to that link.
Because the council’s stated discussion topics fall under attorney–client privilege and personnel/confidential contract deliberations, no substantive details of those discussions were presented in public before the recess. The public portion of the meeting ended for the closed session; no additional public actions or votes were taken before the recess.

