Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Compensation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
City manager, HR back hybrid compensation plan to give all staff raises and target market gaps
Summary
City Manager and HR recommended a hybrid compensation approach: a 2.5% across-the-board increase in July plus about $750,000 held for targeted market adjustments after a January salary survey. Staff tied the $3 million funding envelope to the FY27 budget discussion and noted pay-grade structural changes.
Get email alerts on the Compensation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Emily Proancece, director of human resources, presented four scenarios for allocating $3 million toward employee compensation in FY2026–27 and recommended a hybrid option that combines an immediate modest across-the-board increase with reserved funds for targeted market corrections.
What staff proposed: the recommended plan would give a 2.5% increase to all full-time permanent employees effective in July and reserve roughly three-quarters of a million dollars to address the most significant pay disparities after an early-FY27 salary survey. HR also recommended increasing pay-grade minimums and maximums by 1.5% to maintain classification structure.
Why staff favor it: Proancece and city management said the hybrid preserves a guaranteed raise for every eligible employee while retaining data-driven discretion to address hard-to-fill roles and compression issues. "We would recommend scenario four," staff said, arguing it is "the best of both worlds" because it gives every staff member a raise and sets aside funds for market-based fixes.
Council questions and context: councilors sought more detail on how many employees would remain below the living wage under each scenario and the distribution of impacts between full-time and temporary staff. Staff said scenario one (3.3% across-the-board) would reduce the number of employees below an internally cited living-wage threshold by about eight people, while the flat-dollar scenario two could reduce that number by closer to 100.
Next steps: staff will return with calculations showing how many employees would reach the living-wage threshold under different options and with the tax-impact context needed for council policy decisions.

