Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Charter Amendment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Albany County committee debates charter change to let legislature determine member qualifications
Summary
A proposed charter amendment would let the Legislature investigate and determine its members' qualifications (residency, materially false financial disclosures, felony conviction) by subpoena and vote; members debated due process, the role of the ethics committee and potential appeals to courts.
Get email alerts on the Charter Amendment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Albany County's Law Committee debated a proposed charter amendment (Local Law A) that would give the county legislature explicit authority to determine whether a member meets qualifications to serve, adding enforcement mechanisms for residency requirements and two additional triggers: a legislator's conviction of a felony while in office and a finding that a legislator knowingly filed a materially false financial disclosure.
Sponsors described a three-step framework: initial review by the ethics committee (as the trier of fact for financial disclosure complaints), a legislative investigative committee with subpoena power and the ability to take testimony and require records, and a final decision by the full legislature that could carry sanctions including removal if the requisite vote threshold is met. The sponsor cited Roberts Rules of Order Section 63 as a model for investigation and trial procedures.
Several legislators pressed for safeguards. One expressed concern about giving the legislature unilateral power to "go after" a colleague and urged a clear precursor role for the ethics committee so financial disclosure concerns are adjudicated consistently across county offices. The sponsor and others agreed to refine language so the ethics committee renders an initial finding before the legislature's investigatory process would begin, and to clarify the standard of "materially false" for disclosures.
Committee members also discussed judicial review (Article 78) as an external check and whether convictions on appeal should affect immediate legislative action. The committee voted to send the proposed charter amendment to public hearing subject to language tweaks and further work on standards and process.

