Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Traffic Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Seaford adopts speed‑camera ordinance after second reading; officials emphasize safety, not revenue
Summary
Council adopted an ordinance adding an electronic speed monitoring program to Seaford’s code. Officials said cameras issue civil citations to registered owners beginning roughly 11 mph over the limit and that revenue is intended to cover program costs and support statewide safety programs, not municipal profit.
Seaford’s council adopted an ordinance March 10 to add an electronic speed monitoring system to the municipal code, after a second reading and discussion of vendor operations, revenue use and public outreach.
Staff explained the program would use third‑party vendors approved by the state and that DelDOT requires speed studies before cameras are deployed. The cameras would issue civil citations to registered vehicle owners; staff said enforcement generally begins at about 11 mph over the posted limit and that citations can be contested.
As staff summarized: “these speed cameras … would only issue civil citations to the registered owners of the vehicles that can be contested. There is a process for that and it would generally start at 11 miles an hour over the speed limit.” Council discussed public perception that citations might be used for municipal revenue. Staff emphasized state law limits municipal profit: program revenue can cover installation and maintenance costs; any net revenue beyond costs is distributed to the Office of Highway Safety for statewide safety programs.
Council members also asked about vendor capacity and system maintenance; staff said vendors are responsible for repair and replacement and that availability could be an issue because many municipalities are adopting similar systems.
Vice Mayor Dan Henderson moved to adopt the revisions to Chapter 8 adding Article 11 (electronic speed monitoring system requirements); Councilman Mike Bradley seconded and the ordinance passed unanimously.
