Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Mtss topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Elk Grove Unified board receives overview of MTSS framework, district plans deeper dives
Summary
District education leaders told the board that MTSS (Multi-Tiered System of Supports) is intended to serve every student and emphasized early intervention, culturally responsive practice and coordination across departments. Board members requested implementation timelines, data and training plans.
Mr. Riley, representing the district’s Educational Services and Schools executive team, opened a three-part series on the Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS), telling the Elk Grove Unified School District board that MTSS is "a culturally responsive comprehensive framework" designed to serve "every student." He said MTSS grew from federal special-education reforms and response-to-intervention work and now integrates academic, behavioral and social-emotional supports so students can remain exposed to high-quality first instruction.
The presentation stressed Tier 1 universal instruction in classrooms, Tier 2 targeted small-group supports and Tier 3 intensive, individualized interventions. Riley said district site teams—made up of general-education teachers, special-education staff, psychologists and others—must combine their “mechanistic” expertise into a systems view when designing supports for students with complex needs.
Why it matters: Elk Grove Unified serves a large, diverse student body with many intersecting needs—Riley noted the district tracks multilingual learners, students with disabilities, foster youth and students experiencing homelessness—and board members said they wanted assurance the district can move students quickly between tiers when needed without overburdening schools.
Several board members asked for concrete timelines and proof that MTSS changes have produced academic gains. "I would love to see a timeline for when each of these legs was instituted in our district and evidence/data showing how it has benefited our students," said one board member during Q&A, a request district staff said they will address in future spotlights and case studies. Superintendent Hoffman and district leaders said subsequent presentations (scheduled for November and February) will provide deeper implementation detail: composition of site MTSS teams, referral protocols, case studies and measurement strategies.
Public commenters and equity staff emphasized training and fidelity. Dr. Sereni, a curriculum and instructional coach for educational equity, told the board equity coaching and restorative-practices training are integral to MTSS implementation. Another longtime educator asked the board to reconcile public data showing both PBIS recognition at some sites and continuing high suspension rates for Black students, urging that restorative practices be implemented explicitly as an educational-justice strategy, not as a colorblind technique.
The board also discussed community partnerships—named examples included EG Speaks and Improve Your Tomorrow—as tiered interventions and asked how sites use LCAP (Local Control and Accountability Plan) funds and district coaching to bolster Tier 2/3 supports. District staff said some services are site-funded via LCAP; central district coaching and mental health staff provide itinerant and direct supports.
What’s next: District staff will bring spotlight two with deeper procedural detail, referral examples and case studies; board members signaled they will expect accompanying data showing outcomes and timelines for rollouts.
