Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Literacy Assessment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Palo Alto Unified touts reading gains but faces questions over I‑Ready and data transparency
Summary
District staff told the board that Every Student Reads Initiative cohorts and I‑Ready diagnostics show gains—including 47% of below‑grade readers meeting stretch‑growth goals—while public commenters pressed for clearer disaggregation and independent analysis of the I‑Ready tool.
Palo Alto — At its June 17 meeting the Palo Alto Unified School District presented year‑four results from the Every Student Reads Initiative (ESRI), with staff saying district and matched‑cohort indicators show improved reading outcomes even as members of the public questioned reliance on the I‑Ready diagnostic and asked for more granular reporting.
"47% of the kids that were reading below grade level actually met their stretch growth goal, getting them closer to proficiency," said the district's executive director of curriculum and instruction, Miss Reynolds, during a slide presentation that also explained three levels of data the district monitors: state Smarter Balanced (CASP), district I‑Ready diagnostics, and classroom progress monitoring. Reynolds told the board individualized progress‑monitoring plans for students two or more grades below will be part of the district's 2026 reports.
Reynolds framed the findings as mixed but encouraging: matched‑cohort CASP results for a representative fifth‑grade cohort showed gains; district I‑Ready stretch‑growth exceeded the 45% target, reaching 47%; and teachers will continue targeted interventions for domains such as vocabulary and comprehension.
Public commenters commended the district for progress but pressed for clarity about which student groups are included in each analysis. Leor Mammadov, who said the district moved to a phonics‑based curriculum in 2021, voiced skepticism about the computerized I‑Ready program: "I'm not sure who benefits from I Ready, but I doubt it's the kids." Mammadov urged the board to consider independent evaluation and to balance digital tools with print and teacher‑led instruction.
Ra Yamamoto, a community speaker, pointed to state policy and research and urged support for Assembly Bill 1454, saying that structured literacy instruction and professional development called for in the bill could strengthen district practice. "As AB1454 rolls out, our district can further improve student performance with added resources for 2026 to '29," Yamamoto said.
Board members praised the ESRI team's work and asked for follow‑up on cohorts and next steps. Trustee Cam High asked which cohort the district will present next year; Reynolds said the district will show the same matched cohort (third through fifth grade) in its next report. Trustees emphasized the importance of continuing to monitor both aggregate and disaggregated data and requested classroom‑level progress updates tied to the district's action plan.
The district said more detailed individualized progress‑monitoring results will be presented in winter and spring 2026 as part of its implementation timeline.
What happens next: the board will receive further ESRI checkpoints in fall 2025 and the district will return with individualized progress‑monitoring data in 2026.
