Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Hunting Dogs Farm Bill topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee backs resolution asking Congress to oppose farm‑bill limits on hunting dogs
Summary
House Resolution 188, introduced by the committee chair, was reported favorably Oct. 3 asking Congress to remove or oppose any farm‑bill language that could unintentionally restrict traditional hunting‑dog uses for field and tracking work.
House Resolution 188, presented to the House Committee on Agriculture, Forestry, Aquaculture and Rural Development on Oct. 3, asks Congress to oppose any federal farm‑bill provisions that could be interpreted to restrict the use of hunting dogs for customary field, scent‑hunting and retrieving activities.
Chairwoman Butler described constituent concerns and said her office had received numerous calls from hunters and dog‑owners alarmed by an amendment some sources listed in the Farm Bill as section 12008. Commissioner Mike Strain told the committee he, too, had seen mixed reports: some sources suggested the provision had been removed, while others indicated it remained in draft language and could be interpreted broadly.
“On the strict interpretation of that, you would not be able to use hunting dogs, you know, as trackers or for hunting deer, rabbits, or whatever,” Commissioner Strain said, describing why members asked that language be stripped and why the committee should memorialize Congress to object if the language reappears.
Representative DeWitt moved to report HR 188 favorably; the chair heard no objections and the resolution was reported favorably by the committee (voice motion; no roll‑call tally recorded in the transcript).
Why it matters: Members said the provision, as drafted in some reports, is vague and could have unintended consequences for traditional rural hunting and training practices. The resolution is a formal state‑legislative request to Congress when the farm bill text is under revision
