Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Capital Planning topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Consultants lay out $439.5M facilities master plan; board warned upgrades will rely on mixed funding

Inglewood Unified School District Board of Education · December 11, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Consultants presented an abbreviated facilities master plan estimating $439.5 million in needs across district sites, prioritizing classrooms and modernization, noting constraints from small urban lots and outlining likely funding through local bonds, state modernization grants and developer fees.

The district presented an abbreviated facilities master plan Dec. 10 that inventories campus conditions, sets educational specifications and estimates an approximately $439.5 million program of construction, modernization and upgrades across Inglewood Unified sites.

Consultant CFW (Mr. Flores) and Assistant Superintendent Raphael Guzman told the board the plan evaluates each campus against two ‘state loading’ sizes for TK–8 schools (roughly 535 and 790 pupils) and prioritizes classroom replacement and modernization, removal of aging portable buildings and site improvements to increase green space and optimize nutritional service areas. The presenters emphasized many school buildings are decades old and some may require replacement rather than patchwork modernization.

Mr. Flores explained state funding mechanics: modernization grants require DSA and state education review, take 18–24 months to process, and often districts use local bond funds up front and seek state reimbursement. He identified primary non‑general‑fund sources: general obligation bonds (local), state modernization grants, and developer/mitigation fees. The consultant stressed the plan is a roadmap — implementation timing and scope will depend on available funding and board direction.

Board members raised site‑specific concerns including overcrowding at Oak Street, the need for a STEM center at Payne, and neighborhood expectations related to major local development projects. Members requested the plan be used to guide prioritized capital programming and funding outreach.