Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Senior Olympics Planning topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Miami Lakes subcommittee names Omar chair and outlines plan for Senior Olympics

Senior Olympics Subcommittee, Town of Miami Lakes · March 20, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Miami Lakes Senior Olympics subcommittee appointed Omar as chair and sketched an event plan including an October—6 November window, age bands beginning at 60, six proposed activities, medical and waiver requirements, volunteer staffing, sponsorship outreach and follow-up meetings to finalize logistics.

The Miami Lakes Senior Olympics subcommittee on an initial planning meeting appointed Omar as subcommittee chair and sketched a draft plan for a fall community event aimed at residents 60 and older.

Members voted to name Omar chair after a nomination and second; the vote was recorded as unanimous. The group reviewed an 11-point draft outlining scheduling, events, awards and logistics and agreed to continue planning at monthly meetings and more often as needed before the event.

Why it matters: The meeting set the basic structure and responsibilities for a public, town-run athletic event for older residents, including safety, budget and sponsorship considerations that will shape whether the event is fully town-funded, sponsored or partly a fundraiser.

Committee members said a mid-to-late fall date would best avoid the summer heat; the group repeatedly suggested October or November as the ideal window and discussed holding the event on a Saturday to allow families to attend. No final date was selected; members were asked to check town event calendars for conflicts such as the Veterans Day parade and Spanish Heritage events.

On eligibility and events, planners proposed age bands (examples discussed: 60—64, 65—69, 70—74, 75—79 and 80-plus) to keep competition fair. The draft program includes a mix of low-impact track/walking events, a softball throw, horseshoes, cornhole, a disc/frisbee throw and other target/precision events; members rejected some jumping events as unsafe for many participants.

Awards and participant recognition were discussed with a preference for inexpensive medals or ribbons for the top three finishers and certificates of participation for everyone rather than large trophies to control costs.

Logistics and safety dominated the discussion. Members said they will reserve Veterans Park pavilions, secure park permits, require participant waivers, and develop an emergency action plan with a medical tent or station. The subcommittee discussed asking local hospitals and insurance providers for sponsorship or volunteer medical staffing, and tapping university nursing programs for support, but noted liability and accreditation issues if student volunteers are not credentialed. Members also discussed whether the fire department should be asked to attend and whether that would require a fee.

Food and fundraising: Planners proposed complimentary light breakfast stations for participants (fruit, pastries, bottled water and juice) and low-cost items for sale to the public as a small fundraiser. The group discussed using a coffee vendor or boxed coffee and allowing a limited number of food vendors; members emphasized keeping participant food separate from items sold to the general public.

Equipment and operations: The subcommittee discussed renting or testing existing sound equipment to provide announcements and motivational music, arranging registration and volunteer staffing (including volunteers from other town committees and cleared high-school or university volunteers), and producing participant shirts with sponsor logos.

Next steps: Members asked the new chair to convene follow-ups, create a chat group for subcommittee coordination, gather cost estimates and sponsorship leads, and return with a more detailed budget and timeline at the next meeting. No formal budget was adopted at this meeting.

A motion to adjourn passed and the meeting was closed; the chair will circulate messages about the next meeting date and volunteer assignments.