Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Art topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Forest Park pauses plan to refresh Pride colors on Madison Street after safety and legal concerns
Summary
Council withdrew a motion to refresh faded Pride colors on Madison Street after commissioners raised compliance issues with the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, pedestrian safety and potential liability; the Arts Alliance offered to organize volunteers for alternatives.
Get email alerts on the Public Art topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Forest Park Village Council removed a proposal to refresh the rainbow painted on the Madison Street median from the agenda on June 13 after commissioners raised questions about traffic‑control standards and public‑safety risk.
Karen Rosman of the Forest Park Arts Alliance had offered volunteer help to repaint fading Pride colors ahead of the village’s June 23 Pride celebration. "We would be happy to organize volunteers to restore the painting if the council wants to refresh the colors," the written comment read when presented at the meeting.
Commissioner Vog and other members cited guidance from the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) and concern that the paint’s colors could conflict with pavement marking standards. "The existing mural is not compliant with the manual of uniform traffic control devices," Commissioner Nero said, noting that most of the colors used on the mural do not align with MUTCD permitted pavement‑marking colors and that deviation could create confusion for drivers.
Speakers warned that repainting a median feature without a maintenance plan or code language could expose the village to litigation if the marking distracted drivers or altered lane definitions. "If you deviate from what a normal pavement marking standard would be, you could run the risk of someone arguing they were confused by the colors," a staff member advising the council warned during discussion.
Rather than vote on the request, commissioners voted to withdraw the motion and asked staff to work with the Arts Alliance on alternative ways to mark Pride month that avoid conflicts with traffic control standards or to bring a formal ordinance and maintenance plan back to council for consideration.
Council members suggested options such as relocating visible temporary art that does not affect traffic markings, adding banners or lighting, or drafting an arts‑in‑public‑space ordinance that defines permitted treatments and a removal or maintenance schedule. No formal vote was taken to repaint the median.

