Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Teaching Assignment Monitoring topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Oakdale Joint Unified flags possible state-data errors in teaching-assignment report; district will re-run numbers
Summary
At its Aug. 12 meeting the Oakdale Joint Unified Board received 2022–23 Teaching Assignment Monitoring Outcomes data from state sources, which staff described as confusing and possibly inaccurate; the district said it will run its own comparison and report updated local figures later.
Oakdale Joint Unified trustees were warned Aug. 12 that state-supplied teaching-assignment data for 2022–23 appear inconsistent and may not reflect the district's local records.
A presenter at the meeting summarized the Teaching Assignment Monitoring Outcomes (TAM) data provided by state offices, including the CDE, and said the numbers were “somewhat confusing” and in some places likely inaccurate. The presenter said the state is “notoriously behind” in updating those data and urged the board to treat the results cautiously.
The presenter described how state categories are defined for TAM reporting — for example, “clear credentials,” “out of field,” “intern,” and limited permits that the state counts as “ineffective” — and said incomplete or missing assignment details can produce upward or downward distortions in district figures.
The presenter quoted district figures as given in the state's packet and noted an entry recorded as “233.356” for the district. The presenter also said charter-school figures in the state report appeared inconsistent and gave an example: “we have three teachers at Charter and they are all excellent teachers,” and that some charter reports listed teachers teaching out of field in science for the current year.
Mr. Sanchez, speaking during the discussion, said staff would run the district’s own numbers for comparison. “We’re just kind of curious, so we’re going to run our own numbers to see in comparison what we may land next year,” he said.
Why it matters: Teaching-assignment data are used for local reporting and to meet state monitoring requirements. If state submissions contain errors or omissions, district leaders said the board could present corrected local indicators when they report again.
Next steps: District staff agreed to re-run local calculations, compare them to the state's TAM packet, and report updated local indicators at a future meeting.
