Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Drug Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Panel advances bill to stiffen penalties for public drug use in school zones after heated debate
Summary
The Senate Judiciary B Committee voted 3–2 to report House Bill 568, which would create a behavior-based offense and stiffer penalties for openly smoking or vaping illegal drugs in a school zone; supporters called it a deterrent while opponents warned mandatory penalties and a 2,000-foot radius could criminalize ordinary activity and disproportionately affect urban residents.
Representative Furman presented House Bill 568 to the committee as a measure to strengthen enforcement of Louisiana’s drug-free school zone law by making observable public consumption within the zone a clearly prosecutable offense. Furman and the governor’s office argued the measure would give law enforcement an enforcement tool and provide a deterrent to protect children and families.
Opponents, including Kevin Caldwell of the Marijuana Policy Project, argued the bill would impose mandatory minimum jail terms for public consumption in a 2,000-foot school radius and described that radius as effectively covering large swaths of urban neighborhoods. Caldwell testified the measure “criminalizes place, not conduct,” and warned it would disproportionately affect Black and Brown Louisianians and increase incarceration costs without improving child safety.
Veterans and medical-patient witnesses said they feared being caught in the zone and urged the committee to narrow or clarify provisions. Representative Furman and Christopher Walters of the governor’s office repeatedly said medical cannabis patients, caregivers and licensed operators acting within statutory protections are not intended to be impacted and that existing statutory definitions of school zones are unchanged.
Senator DuPlessis pressed sponsors for data showing the bill would improve outcomes; sponsors and administration representatives said they would review comparative studies but emphasized urgency to provide tools to law enforcement. Senator Talbot asked the sponsor to consider studies that show different effects in other states.
When the committee took a role-call vote on the motion to report the bill, the tally was three ayes and two nays and the committee reported House Bill 568 favorably. The transcript shows continued disagreement about whether the policy will deter behavior or simply expand incarceration for low-level offenses. The sponsor said he will work with colleagues and the governor’s office as the bill moves forward.
