Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Child Support topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate committee advances bill requiring insurers to check for child‑support arrears before paying certain settlements
Summary
The Senate Committee on Insurance reported House Bill 1241 favorably after its author said insurers would be required to check with DCFS for delinquent child‑support before issuing certain settlements so withheld amounts can be remitted to children’s support accounts.
House Bill 1241 would require insurers issuing some settlements (for lost wages, pain and suffering, workers’ compensation) to check with the Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS) for delinquent child‑support and, if arrears exist, withhold the amount and send it to DCFS.
Chairman Furman, the bill’s House sponsor, told the committee the measure is “very simple” and intended to make sure children receive unpaid child‑support when a noncustodial parent receives an insurance payment. Furman credited DCFS and the Department of Insurance for helping craft the proposal and said the bill has faced no organized opposition so far.
Charles Watkins, a DCFS representative, described the state’s current tools for collecting arrears — “casino intercept,” garnishment, passport seizure and license suspension — and said Louisiana currently lacks a mechanism to automatically check insurance settlements for child‑support liens. Watkins said the bill would remove steps that now depend on custodial parents or caseworkers notifying the insurer and would make the process more automatic.
Senators asked practical questions about safeguards. Senator Plessis asked how current systems identify outstanding judgments; Watkins pointed to a central child‑support database used to check arrears. Senator Seeball raised a potential drafting gap in paragraph g(3) over insurer liability, asking whether the bill should explicitly protect insurers that mistakenly fail to withhold or create penalties for failing to act. The author said he would work with DCFS and the committee to tighten language before the bill reaches the floor.
Senator Barrow pressed on due‑process concerns after DCFS notifies someone they are in arrears. Watkins said DCFS is often notified by the courts or custodial parents and does not always receive the underlying reason (for example, whether a small arrear is caused by court processing fees rather than nonpayment). The author and DCFS acknowledged the concern but said it was outside the bill’s narrow aim — the bill relies on DCFS’s existing arrears determinations.
A motion to report the bill favorably was made and sustained by voice consent; the chair read submitted supporter cards, and the committee reported HB1241 favorably to the full Senate without a roll‑call vote recorded in the transcript. The committee also agreed to work on clarifying language about insurer liability before floor action.
What happens next: HB1241 was reported favorably and will be scheduled for floor consideration, subject to any technical edits or liability clarifications the author and DCFS develop.
