Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Municipal Governance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Residents urge Larkspur council to adopt half‑staff flag policy after recent lowering

Larkspur City Council · September 17, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Multiple public commenters asked the city to adopt a formal policy requiring council review before lowering the municipal flag to half‑staff, arguing presidential proclamations are advisory for local governments and that unilateral decisions risk political division.

Several residents used the public‑comment period at the Sept. 17 Larkspur City Council meeting to urge a citywide flag policy to guide decisions about lowering the municipal flag to half‑staff.

Anita Bach told the council the city lacks a written policy and asked council review be required "when circumstances so warrant," saying the U.S. Flag Code (Title 4 U.S. Code) is advisory and that local governments are not legally obligated to follow presidential proclamations for municipal flags. "I call on the council to take immediate action to prevent a recurrence of this unfortunate action," Bach said.

Steve Kaplan, another resident, urged the council to debate flag actions instead of leaving the matter to staff, arguing that "over the last nine or 10 years, the American flag has been co‑opted by far‑right extremists" and that lowering a municipal flag can be taken as a political signal.

Council members acknowledged the concern and asked staff for a primer on the rules that govern flag lowering and for consideration of whether to agendaize a formal city policy; however, the council took no immediate policy action at the meeting.

Why it matters: flag‑lowering decisions intersect ceremonial practice and political symbolism. Residents who addressed the council asked for a transparent, council‑level process to avoid unintentional community discord.