Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Utility Locates topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee advances bill to tighten utility locate response for designers and surveyors

Senate Committee on Transportation and Energy · March 11, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Senators approved SB 340 to address delays in the state's one-call system for design and surveying professionals, introducing penalties if locate requests are not completed within a specified multiple of the current response window; sponsors invited stakeholders to a later meeting for input.

A Senate committee on Transportation and Energy approved SB 340, a bill aimed at improving responsiveness in the state's one-call utility‑locate system for designers and surveyors.

The sponsor told the committee that the excavator side of the one-call system generally functions, but the design and survey side routinely fails to produce timely locates. The sponsor said designers sometimes request locates multiple times — in some cases one to a dozen requests — and receive no response, forcing project teams to guess where buried utilities lie and later redesign in the field when contractors obtain accurate locates.

Why it matters: The sponsor said the current disconnect slows projects, drives up costs, and increases the risk of missing utilities during construction. SB 340 would set a clearer timetable for responding to design/survey locate requests and impose penalties if locates are not provided within a specified multiple of the current allotment (the transcript describes penalty thresholds but does not list a statutory citation or exact penalty amounts).

Procedure and outcome: Senator Weaver moved the bill and Senator Livingston seconded. The sponsor invited stakeholders to a 1:30 p.m. meeting for further input. The clerk recorded a roll call and the committee approved the bill; the transcript records individual 'present' responses but does not provide a numeric vote tally.

Next steps: The sponsor encouraged stakeholder participation in the follow-up meeting; the hearing record did not list a floor schedule or precise statutory language for penalties.