Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Budget topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council approves first reading of $56.8M supplemental budget, carrying forward major projects including Lake Mitchell

Mitchell City Council · April 6, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

City finance staff presented a supplemental appropriation ordinance totaling roughly $56.8 million—largely projects carried forward from 2025, including the Lake Mitchell program and multiple utility and parks projects—and council approved the first reading and scheduled a second reading at the next meeting.

The Mitchell City Council approved the first reading of a supplemental appropriation ordinance that would carry approximately $56.8 million in projects and adjustments into fiscal 2026.

Finance staff said about 94% of the total ($53.4 million) represents projects started in 2025 that are being carried forward, with Lake Mitchell listed as the largest single item. About 4% represents cost increases that emerged after the original budget (including the ice arena roof), while under 2% are new requests. Some projects carry anticipated grant revenue—airport runway and hangar projects, for example—that will offset large portions of the cost.

Staff reviewed fund‑level impacts: enterprise funds (utilities) carry several large projects forward; the general fund contains storm‑drainage and streetscape carryovers; and the Park & Recreation fund includes the sports complex line where the ice arena roof increases were recorded. To preserve contingency in the face of sales‑tax pressure, staff recommended cutting a small set of discretionary park items and rebalancing reserves; staff also identified potential transfers (for example, a limited general fund transfer to the campground fund if the storm shelter bid comes in at the high end).

Council voted to approve first reading; staff will return with any changes and a second reading for final adoption at a subsequent meeting. Several council members asked for line‑item detail and assurance that grant revenues and reserves cover the larger projects.