Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Alimony Enforcement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Bill to require enforcement of alimony orders aims to close perceived judicial gap
Summary
Representative Markeel sought to close what he described as a hole allowing courts to decline enforcement of alimony awards. Sponsors said the bill would give obligees a clearer remedy; committee discussion focused on judicial discretion and enforcement mechanisms.
Representative Markeel told the committee HB1228 would close a gap in enforcement practice by making clear that alimony awards are enforceable and should not be left unenforced at a judge's whim. "It is possible for somebody to have an alimony award and have a court simply walk in the door and say I'm not going to enforce it," he said, and the bill would plug that hole.
Members discussed how alimony awards are currently enforced (wage assignment, garnishment, contempt) and whether the bill would unduly limit judicial discretion. The sponsor said the remedy is intended for cases where a court currently declines to enforce an otherwise valid order and that remedies such as attorney's fees could be available to address abusive litigation.
The hearing produced mainly clarifying questions; no vote was taken. Committee members asked for examples of judicial non‑enforcement and whether the bill could be weaponized by vexatious litigants; the sponsor said courts retain tools to sanction abuse.
