Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Board Agenda topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
San Ramon Valley Unified board approves closed-session agenda covering claim rejection and two property negotiations
Summary
The San Ramon Valley Unified School District Board of Education voted 4-0 to approve a closed-session agenda that includes rejection of claim 6598584, negotiations over two properties and consideration of an appeal under Government Code 54957 subb.
The San Ramon Valley Unified School District Board of Education voted 4-0 to approve a closed-session agenda that includes the recommended rejection of claim 6598584 and two real-property negotiation items, the board said.
The board opened the meeting with a livestream notice and roll call. Trustees Rachel Herd (Trustee Area 5), Jesse Vanzee (Area 1), Susanna Ordway (Area 4) and Shelley Clark (Area 2) were present; Trustee Brat was not in attendance.
The presiding officer read the closed-session items, which the board said included: the rejection of claim number 6598584 against the district; a conference with real property negotiators under Government Code section 54956.8 regarding property at 699 Old Orchard Drive, Danville, 94526, with Agency Negotiator Daniel Hillman, Assistant Superintendent, Business Services, negotiating with Bates Stringer; and a second Government Code 54956.8 item concerning a portion of property at 2600 Camino Raone, San Ramon, 94583, with Daniel Hillman negotiating with Sunset Development. The agenda also listed a possible closed-session appeal under Government Code section 54957 subb regarding an appeal of a level-three complaint (PC2503) submitted under BPAR 13121.
A board member moved to accept the closed-session agenda and another seconded. The board vocalized assent; four “I” responses were recorded and the presiding officer stated that the motion carried. No public comment was offered on the closed-session agenda prior to the vote.
The motion recorded in the meeting was to accept the close-session agenda; the transcript records the motion and a second and a subsequent voice vote. The board did not take further public actions on the items listed in the closed-session agenda on the public record during the portion of the meeting covered by the transcript.
The board’s acceptance of the agenda set the stage for the listed matters to be discussed in closed session.
