Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Kratom Regulation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Independence health board tables kratom ordinance after experts and industry clash over risks and enforcement

Independence Advisory Board of Health · March 11, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Independence Advisory Board of Health reviewed a proposed ordinance to ban highly intoxicating kratom derivatives, limit kratom sales to people 21 and older, and set penalties; after expert testimony and industry comment the board voted to table the measure until April 2 for further review.

The Independence Advisory Board of Health voted to table consideration of a proposed kratom ordinance until its next regular meeting on April 2 after a lengthy discussion that included clinical concerns, industry testimony and questions about enforcement.

The measure introduced by Mayor Roland would ban highly intoxicating kratom derivatives (identified in the ordinance as 7-hydroxymitragynine), require kratom products to be sold only to people 21 and older, and create penalties of up to $500 and up to six months’ incarceration for each separate sale or violation. "What we're really looking at here is the sale of 7-hydroxy," Mayor Roland said, describing the proposal as modeled on a Kansas City ordinance and saying he sought the board's recommendation before a second reading at city council.

Board members and medical participants raised public-health concerns. A physician on the board said she had encountered neonatal withdrawal symptoms in infants born to mothers using over-the-counter kratom and noted that the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists advises against kratom use in pregnancy and breastfeeding. "There is an incidence of neonatal withdrawal symptoms that we see in newborn children born to mothers using the over-the-counter kratom," the physician said. Another participant cited a coroner's report attributing a June 2021 Independence death to kratom intoxication.

City public-health staff noted existing regulatory limits: Independence has adopted the 2022 FDA Retail Food Code and does not permit kratom in food or drink products under that code. Staff also said that if the ordinance is adopted enforcement would likely be handled by the police department rather than routine health inspections and could be complaint-driven or similar to underage alcohol enforcement.

Industry representatives who spoke urged regulatory clarity rather than an outright ban on plant kratom. Todd Underwood, who identified himself as president and CEO of Mit Wellness, described manufacturing and labeling practices and said the chemical 7-hydroxymitragynine is mainly a post-harvest oxidation product; he also noted several Missouri municipalities and multiple state bills are addressing kratom regulation. "On most testing, 7-hydroxy is non-detectable in there," Underwood said.

Board members discussed possible amendments to add a registration and fee for retailers to fund enforcement; speakers referenced Kansas City's $500-per-location fee and estimated similar local revenue of roughly $20,000–$40,000 annually if applied widely, though the exact figure was presented as an estimate. Members expressed concern about whether the police department has the capacity and resources to enforce a new ordinance without additional funding or staffing.

After hearing comments from clinicians, recovery specialists and industry, a board member moved to table the ordinance to allow members time to review the literature, receive additional information from staff (including possible input from police on enforcement) and reconvene. The motion was seconded and the chair called the vote; the motion carried. The transcript does not specify an exact roll-call tally.

The board's next regular meeting is scheduled for April 2, at which members said they expect to revisit the ordinance with supplemental materials and possible proposed amendments.