Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Presentations Definition topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Rules committee debates language to limit 'presentations' after faith-based dispute; defers item for redraft
Summary
The committee considered adding a definition of "presentations" that would bar personal, religious or ideological advocacy. Commissioners debated potential impacts on faith-based county partners and chair authority; the sponsor agreed to revise the language and the committee deferred the item to the next Rules meeting.
The Knox County Commission Rules Committee spent extensive time debating a proposed addition to Rule Five that would define "presentations" for legislative agendas and limit them from being used for "personal, religious, philosophical, or ideological advocacy." The committee ultimately deferred the proposal for redrafting after members raised concerns about its scope and possible effects on county partners.
Commissioner Durrett, the sponsor, told the committee that presentations are "informal items" that are typically given by departments or invited presenters and said the rule would clarify that "presentations are not for a vote" and "do not express views of commission." The proposal also would allow the chair to enforce time limits.
Several commissioners worried the wording could unintentionally restrict faith-based community partners. Commissioner Hill asked how the county would determine what qualifies as "county business," and Director Moyers advised that the chair initially determines scope and that any ruling by the chair can be appealed to the commission by majority vote.
Guest Commissioner Fox defended a recent presentation he gave, saying it provided background "related to county business" and that he "brought in actual words, black letter words" to explain his position. Commissioner Russell argued that many past presentations contained ideological elements but still served to educate commissioners: "If all we're listening to is people that we agree with then what are we learning?" he said.
After discussion the sponsor said he would consider the comments and produce a revised draft. Commissioner Durrett moved to defer the item to the next Rules Committee meeting and Commissioner Thompson seconded; the motion passed. The committee scheduled its next meeting for Monday, April 20 at 2:00 p.m.
