Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Foreign Military Sales topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee member urges overhaul of Foreign Military Sales process, cites about $250 billion backlog
Summary
A member of the House Committee on Foreign Affairs told the committee that the Foreign Military Sales process is fragmented across agencies, lacks a single database for oversight and carries about $250 billion in backlog, calling for reorganization and clearer accountability under presidential direction.
A member of the House Committee on Foreign Affairs urged a major overhaul of the U.S. Foreign Military Sales (FMS) process on Wednesday, saying the patchwork of agency responsibilities has left oversight “an impossibility.” The member told the committee that the system traces back to the Department of State’s nonproliferation mission, is routed through the Department of Defense (the transcript uses the term "Department of War"), and involves the Commerce Department without a unified database.
"We have a primary responsibility of oversight and the power of the purse oversight is an impossibility when there isn't a single database where managers, leaders can look at it," the committee member said, arguing that the absence of an interoperable record prevents meaningful metrics and accountability.
The lawmaker said program managers sometimes substitute equipment that is obsolete or nearing obsolescence and described the personnel toll: "I hate to say it is 27,000 people over there, mostly fighting for programs," the member said, characterizing parts of the acquisition workforce as focused on internal program fights rather than coordinated operational priorities.
The member also said the backlog in FMS orders is significant: "There's about $250 billion of backlog in the Foreign Military Sales," and added that that amount "exceeds our procurement [at the Defense Department] on an annual basis," framing the backlog as a constraint on rebuilding command-and-control and allied supply chains.
Praising recent steps by the administration, the speaker said reorganization should prioritize speed, lethality and a shared database so Congress and managers can apply metrics and hold people accountable. The member referenced the president's authority under Article Two in directing foreign policy and said that when the president decides to deliver a system, “that system needs to be accountable.”
No formal motion or vote was recorded in the transcript excerpt provided. The discussion focused on diagnosis and oversight recommendations rather than on a specific legislative proposal or binding direction to staff.
